Societal interaction
The evaluation and processing of the societal interaction in the Department of Nursing Science is presented in the table below.
 
EVALUATION OF THE SOCIETAL INTERACTION
TIMING
RESPONSIBILITY
1. Interest group feedback
Continuous, in different collaboration meetings
Staff members
2. Action facts from Department’s work
- number of graduates, achievement of the educational goal
- employment rates of the graduates
- costs by item of expenditure (salaries, consumable costs, part-time teacher’s salaries, practical training costs, infrastructure costs)
- amount of received grants
- number of publications from the staff
Annually
Head and vice-head of the Department
3. Research collaboration
- amount of research collaboration
- extent of research collaboration
- external funding
- international partners
- new openings
- innovations
Each acadmic term, in research development days
Head of the Department
4. Educational collaboration
- amount of regional education
- quality of regional collaboration (number of participants and feedback)
Calendar year, feedback information in staff meetings
Staff members
5. Business collaboration
- amount and quality of business collaboration
Evaluation and development work is beginning
 
6. Expert tasks
- amount of expert tasks
- quality of expert tasks
Continuous follow-up
Staff members
7. Collaboration with hospital district
- feedback discussions with representatives from the hospital district
- feedback related to educational collaboration
Continuous follow-up
Staff members
 
 
Staff and client satisfaction and interest group’s feedback and its management ways are described in the table below.
 
FEEDBACK FROM THE WORK OF THE DEPARTMENT
TIMING
RESPONSIBILITY
1. Staff surveys
Every second year
University of Turku, Human resources office
2. Feedback gathered from review discussions
Once a year
Head of the Department, staff
3. Feedback in special occasions
On demand, immediately
Staff
4. Student feedback
Annual feedback day
Head of the Department, Study advisor, Adaptus
5. Students’ study module evaluations
After every study module
Teacher in responsible for teaching
6. Feedback box
Continuous
University teacher/graduate studies, Study advisor
7. Feedback from practical training
Continuous
At the end of practical training period
Supervisor of the practical training
8. Feedback from interest groups
Continuous, different collaboration meetings
Staff members
9. Action facts from Department’s work
- number of graduates, achievement of the educational goal
- employment rates of the graduates
- costs by item of expenditure (salaries, consumable costs, part-time teacher’s salaries, practical training costs, infrastructure costs)
- amount of received grants
- number of publications from the staff
Annually
Head and vice-head of the Department
Keywords:
Tags: