Three Minute Thesis (3MT) Competition
The first Three Minute Thesis competition was organised at the University of Queensland in Australia in 2008. Annually, approximately 350 universities around the world organise the competition. University of Turku has taken part in the competition first in 2017. The competition provides the participants excellent practice for presenting, popularising, and summarising their own research topics. The participants will receive 1 credit for their UTUGS science communication studies.
Who will be the next winner?
Come and find out in the University’s fourth 3MT competition on Thursday, 5 March. The competition is held at Turku School Economics in the OP lecture hall at 12.15pm. The event is open for public. Your vote really matters, because the audience will choose the winner of People's Choice. No registration to the event needed.
About the 3MT Competition
The Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) competition celebrates the exciting research conducted by Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) students. Developed by The University of Queensland (UQ), the exercise cultivates students’ academic, presentation, and research communication skills.
The competition supports their capacity to effectively explain their research in three minutes, in a language appropriate to a non-specialist audience.
The first 3MT competition was held at UQ in 2008 with 160 Research Higher Degree students competing. In 2009 and 2010 the 3MT competition was promoted to other Australian and New Zealand universities and enthusiasm for the concept grew.
Since 2011, the popularity of the competition has increased and 3MT competitions are now held in over 170 universities across more than 18 countries worldwide.
Active PhD and Professional Doctorate (Research) candidates who have successfully passed their confirmation milestone (including candidates whose thesis is under submission) by the date of their first presentation are eligible to participate in 3MT competitions at all levels. Graduates are not eligible.
- A single static PowerPoint slide is permitted. No slide transitions, animations or ‘movement’ of any description are allowed. The slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration.
- No additional electronic media (e.g. sound and video files) are permitted.
- No additional props (e.g. costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment) are permitted.
- Presentations are limited to 3 minutes maximum and competitors exceeding 3 minutes are disqualified.
- Presentations are to be spoken word (e.g. no poems, raps or songs).
- Presentations are to commence from the stage.
- Presentations are considered to have commenced when a presenter starts their presentation through either movement or speech.
- The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
At every level of the competition each competitor will be assessed on the judging criteria listed below. Each criterion is equally weighted and has an emphasis on audience.
Comprehension & Content
- Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background to the research question being addressed and its significance?
- Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research including conclusions and outcomes?
- Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
- Was the thesis topic, key results and research significance and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
- Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
- Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation – or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed?
Engagement & Communication
- Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
- Was the presenter careful not to trivialise or generalise their research?
- Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
- Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience’s attention?
- Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
- Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?
Tiina Lehtiniemi (Doctoral Programme of Molecular Medicine) won the 3MT competition held in 2019 with her presentation titled "Quality sperm – how it’s produced and the secrets within!".
The Runner-Up was Pooneh Sotoudehnia with her presentation titled "From food waste to saving lives" and People's Choice was won by Riikka Harikkala-Laihinen with her presentation "The power of positivity".
Photo: Hanna Oksanen
Khalil Shahramian from the Institute of Dentistry won with his presentation titled "Bioactive Coatings to Improve Implant-Gum Relationships & Soft Tissue Attachment Issues". Khalil also won the People's Choice at the competition held by the University of Turku. He competed with his presentation at the Annual Conference of Coimbra Group in Salamanca on 1 June 2018 and won the international 3MT competition aswell.
Runner-Up was Pablo Pérez Chaves (Doctoral Programme in Biology, Geography and Geology) with his presentation titled "Mapping Amazonia Using Machine Learning and Satellite Imagery".
Photos: Hanna Oksanen
Tarek Omran (Finnish Doctoral Programme in Oral Sciences) won the 3MT competition arranged in the University of Turku in 2017. His presentation was titled "Optimizing dental composite structures: A bio-memetic approach to dental mechanics".
The Runner-Up was Saana Myllyntausta (Doctoral Programme of Clinical Investigation) with the presentation titled "Retirement - a window of opportunity for better sleep?". The audience voted Kalypso Filippou (Doctoral Programme on Educational Policy, Lifelong Learning and Comparative Education Research) as the winner of the People's Choice with her presentation titled "A thesis on theses!".
Photo: Hanna Oksanen